Add async saga compensation threat modeling gates#2236
Open
Errordog2 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/claim #2224
Summary
Why
Issue #2224 notes that async workflows should not be treated as unsafe only because they lack one ACID transaction, but also should not pass without evidence for idempotency, compensation ownership, DLQ handling, reconciliation SLA, and auditability. This PR makes those gates explicit.
Validation
git diff --checkindex.yamlfile existence checkrgcheck for version and new async saga sections